Former owner of Kampala Parents School, Kasole Bwerere has spoken out on how the school ended up in Sudhir Ruparelia’s hands.

In an exclusive interview with EagleOnline, Mr. Edward Bwerere Kasole who is a former Member of Parliament for Buwekula country in Mubende district says he has never complained about the manner in which City tycoon, Sudhir took over the school. And dismisses the social media messages are fake and untrue. He says he was surprised by such messages and warns that unless regulations are put in place for internet users, many are to suffer at the hands of mischievous people.

“I never had any loan with Sudhir nor did I own any account in his bank at the time. I only got to know Sudhir through Kasagga who brought him to me as a buyer of the school and he fully paid me.” Mr. Bwerere said at his Buloba home.

Adding “Unfortunately the key witness (the late Zzimwe) is no longer around. However, his friends; Kirumira (Godffrey), Mudunga is close friends are all aware. I don’t demand anything from him. In fact he saved me because I had loans that I had failed to pay the loans.”

Mr. Bwerere faults a section of parents and some teachers at school led by Mr. Peter Nyombi, (Former Attorney General) who was then a parent at the school. Bwerere says Nyombi championed the breakaway of City Parents from Kampala Parents School hence curtailing Mr. Bwerere from moving students from Namirembe road to the new location in Naguru and this was this was the main reason, he failed to pay loans and opted to sell it.

“Twelve of the teachers I had been using the other side (Namirembe Road) one is Nyombi (Peter), a former Attorney General) and the other is now a Bishop were paid and grabbed my pupils I had the other side (Namirembe road). In fact, they just made a few changes to my former school. They replaced ‘Kampala’ with ‘City’ to make it City Parents Primary School from Kampala Parents Primary School.” He said.

Below is the interview

How did you start Kampala Parents School?

I started Kampala Parents School in 1975, and it was the first private school and this alone landed my in prison for a week when President Idi Amin questioned how a Ugandan could start a first private primary school.

How did you manage to succeed then after all the trouble?

When in power, President Milton Obote (II) had appointed me as a custodian of the land along Namirembe Road in appreciation for my contribution towards Uganda’s education (Kasole was the first Ugandan to start up a private school). I didn’t pay any rent. He told me that if time came to sell it off by its owners, I would be given priority to buy it.

I constructed three flats on the land. Unfortunately, when government changed with the arrival of the NRM government, the laws changed and properties were returned back to the Indians.

What happened after the custodian properties were returned to the owners?

Following this incident, I had to shift my school. At the time I had over 1850 pupils. Preparing to relocate, I reached an agreement with my friend, Andrew Kasagga (the late Zzimwe of Zzimwe constructions) who had seven pupils in the school. He was to help me construct another school in Naguru. I got a loan from Greenland Bank and East Africa Development Bank.

However, the money was still not enough. But this didn’t stop him from going ahead with the work. He agreed to construct the school and I was to pay him his balance later. The would be interest on his balance was that his seven children were to study for free till completion. It was a good deal. We agreed he was to complete constructing the school in 12 month but it was finished even a month earlier. It was completed after just 11 months.

After making my assessment, I came to a conclusion that I was likely to lose 500 pupils out of 1850 because of the change in location of the school. I intended to use the cash flow from the remaining pupils to pay off the loans I had borrowed from East African Development Bank but I was mistaken.

What followed after the transfer of location of the school?

Twelve of the teachers I had been using the other side (Namirembe Road) and a section of parents and one is Nyombi (Peter), a former Attorney General) and the other is now a Bishop were paid and grabbed my pupils I had the other side (Namirembe road). In fact, they just made a few changes to my former school. They replaced ‘Kampala’ with ‘City’ to make it City Parents Primary School from Kampala Parents Primary School.

They even never changed the school uniform save for slight changes on the school badge. For the Bishop, if he were to enter church when I am inside, I would get out. He is a treacherous man.

When they took away my pupils, those I had (Naguru) could not settle the loans like I had acquired. The interest on the loans was accumulating yet I had no other option. Around the same period Greenland Bank was embroiled in problems. I knew by delaying to pay the loans, I was risking.

How did you come to meet Sudhir and did you have a loan with him as it is alleged that he grabbed the school from you after failing to repay?

So in the process of trying to settle the loans, I went out as a willing seller and Mr. Sudhir (Ruparelia) came out as a willing buyer. Among the three possible buyers, Sudhir had the best offer. He was to pay all the money at once unlike the other two who wanted to complete payment after years; possibly from the fees from my pupils. We sat down (myself and Sudhir) and agreed on terms. He paid me cash… cash down. So all these saying that Sudhir grabbed my school I just don’t have any idea of where they are getting that from.

I never had any loan with Sudhir nor did I own any account in his bank at the time. I only got to know Sudhir through Kasagga who brought him to me as a buyer of the school and he fully paid me. Unfortunately the key witness (the late Zzimwe) is no longer around. However, his friends; Kirumira (Godffrey), Mulenga is close friends are all aware. I don’t demand anything from him. In fact he saved me because I had loans that I had failed to pay the loans.

Do you exist the school immediately after selling or you remained with some shares?

On selling off the school to him, he requested me to stay and continue as his employee, saying he was a businessman and had no knowledge about education. I told him that if I was to stay behind, all the team I had been working with was also to stay behind. I signed a one year contract as chairman board of directors of the school. It was actually in that year that I opened an account in his bank since all his employees were paid from that bank (Crane Bank). I used to chair all of the meetings and also used to train him. Upon completion of my contract, I quit to concentrate on my constituency (Buwekula, Mubende). I left in good faith and actually some the teachers I left there, one is still there while another just left last year. We are friends up to today.

So is it true that you made complains about the school as being portrayed on social media?

Actually when I heard rumours claiming that had told the press that he grabbed my school, I was the first person to call him to apologise for I hadn’t talked to any media. You are actually the first press people I am talking to.

How is life outside politics?

Life outside politics is nice….because when you get out of politics you enjoy

How is Mubende Parents, the school you started after selling KPS?

It is doing well but I have left the management to my children because as you can see, I can’t be in the running of day to day affairs.

I am professional teacher and I enjoyed my work and that could explain how the schools I have managed have been successful.

What occupies you at the moment?

I am into agriculture and if you had come to Mubende, you would return with full sacks of maize because this season alone, I harvested over 250 bags. However, I came here at my residence (Buloba) to check on the construction of apartments and do a medical checkup with my doctors. We have left the city for you young people.

Stories Continues after ad

The ongoing whistleblower campaign by the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) has recovered over Shs1.8 billion through information provided by over 140 whistleblowers, figures from the Fund show.

Last month, the NSSF unveiled a new web-based whistleblower platform for aggrieved employees to report employers who fail to remit their contributions to the Fund, as required by the law.

“Up to 90% of the cases received were through the NSSF Whistleblower platform, hence proving that it is one of the Fund’s most effective tools to increase compliance levels and recover billions of employees’ contributions meant for their retirement,” said Ms Barbra Teddy Arimi, the NSSF Head of Marketing and Communications.

According to Ms Arimi, more than 25,000 employers are meant to pay NSSF contributions. However, 12,000 of these are not complying and of the 13,000 who are complying, only 8,900 are consistently remitting NSSF contributions for their employees.

“These figures show that a significant number of workers are being cheated out of their benefits by their employers,” she said.

A total of 149 cases received over the last 4 months, January recorded the most cases at 55, followed by October (27).

She added that this is a continuous campaign, urging employees to continue being vigilant and speak out to ensure that their employers remit their savings to the Fund.

“We have taken all the necessary steps to ensure that the identity of whoever reports cases of non-compliance is not revealed to the public, in line with the Whistleblower’s Act,” she said, on the safety of those that report.

According to the NSSF Act 1985 Section 11 (1), all employers with five or more employees are required to remit monthly contributions for their employees within 15 days, following the last day of the month for which the relevant wages are paid.

The employers deduct 5 per cent of their workers salary and top it up with a 10 per cent contribution and remit the 15 per cent to the Fund for every employee.

Last financial year, the Fund’s contributions increased by 14% from Shs785 billion in 2014/15 to Shs816 billion in 2015/16.

The Fund projects that contributions will reach the Shs900 billion mark this financial year ending June if the compliance levels are improved, among other things.

Stories Continues after ad

Renowned city journalist-cum businessman Andrew Mwenda has been sued over anonymous online government critic, a one Tom Voltaire Okwalinga, also known as TVO.

Through Odokel Opolot & Co Advocates, cyber security expert Robert Shaka has dragged Mwenda to court accusing him of defamation.

“We act for and on behalf of our client Robert Shaka, on whose behest and stern instructions we address you as herein under; it is well within your knowledge that our client is a person of great repute as information security expert. It is also well within your knowledge that on 29^th January, 2016 you purported to disclose the identity of a one Tom Voiltaire Okwalinga, TVO, an anonymous and or pseudonymous internet blogger who utilizes Facebook as a forum to criticize the Government of the Republic of Uganda,” reads part of the plaint sent to Mwenda.

“That this was through your Facebook account where you alleged that it’s not rocket science to establish the persons behind TVO. That without any incline of truth or justification you maliciously, unlawfully and illegally mentioned our clients name to be among the persons behind TVO. In the said publication on your Facebook account you defamed our client and in particular you described him as a ‘radical extremist and demented psychopathic maniac’. The above description to the person of our client had the effect of causing public scandal, public odium, shame, contempt, hatred, mistrust and ridicule both locally and internationally.”

The plaint further states that Shaka wants Mwenda to immediately pull down the said post from his Facebook account. He also wants him to write a written apology in a newspaper ‘of wide circulation and finally pay our client Shs300million for the damages caused’.

“We also demand that you pay our legal fees of Shs5million so far. Failure to heed to the foregoing within 5 days shall leave us with no option but to commence a suit against you at your own cost, chagrin and perpetual regret.”

Reacting to the plaint, Mwenda says he just can’t wait to appear in court.

“By suing for defamation Shaka is admitting that to be known as TVO would cause ‘right thinking members of society’ to see him with contempt, ridicule and hatred. Only radical extremists supporting opposition presidential candidate for life, Besigye, cannot see TVO for the demented psychopathic maniac he is. I cannot wait for that day in court to cross examine this psychopath,” he responded Friday through Facebook.

Stories Continues after ad