Stanbic Bank
Stanbic Bank
21.2 C
Kampala
Stanbic Bank
Stanbic Bank
Home Blog Page 1203

Coffee price crisis: Global stakeholders meet to agree on joint actions

Smallholder coffee farmers

 

CEOs, executives and global leaders of the coffee sector will converge to the International Coffee Organisation (ICO) Forum in London on Monday to sign a Declaration, with a clear Road-Map, reaffirming their commitment to work with Governments, development partners and civil society and to implement concrete solutions to address the current coffee price crisis and transformational actions to achieve a sustainable future for the coffee sector.

It is the first time that all leading coffee stakeholders, from all over the world, agree to be together with Government representatives showing a strong commitment to jointly implement solutions for a sustainable and inclusive development of the coffee sector in a spirit of shared values and determined to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

The Forum is the response by Coffee industry executives and Leaders — mobilised by the International Coffee Organization (ICO) — to the strong call by the Governments of exporting and importing countries to contribute to solving the dramatic impact that the current price level (a drop in coffee prices by 30% over the last two years) of exported raw coffee has on farmers and coffee-producing economies.

At the same time consumption of coffee increases by a healthy average of 2.2% a year and over the past two decades, the global coffee sector has expanded significantly as demand for coffee has increased by 65%, with farmers increasing production by 50% over the past two decades reaching an export of US$20 million a year.

Government signatories to the International Coffee Agreement (2007), at the 122nd Session of the International Coffee Council in September 2018, adopted Resolution 465 on coffee price levels, mandating the ICO, “to promote dialogue among all stakeholders in the coffee value chain to ensure the economic sustainability of the coffee producers…“ and the ICO Executive Director to “further strengthen ties with the international roasting industry as a matter of urgency, in order to gain support for the implementation of this resolution…”

The first CEO and Global Leaders Forum of the coffee sector, marks the sixth consultative event of an unprecedented sector-wide dialogue led by the ICO, to address the impact of low prices on the livelihoods of coffee farmers as well as the long-term sustainability of the coffee sector.

The sector dialogue since October 2018, has already gathered a rich portfolio of views, solutions, best practices and programmes through consultations held in Nairobi, Kenya, at the United Nations in New York, in a development fair in Rome, Italy and at the European Commission in Brussels, involving 80 world coffee and development experts and over 2,000 participants.

Further consultation among industry representatives, development partners, governments and civil society was carried out by the ICO with the support of consultancy NewForesight with financial support from the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).

This process lead to this first CEO and Global Leaders forum and the expected signing of the London Declaration on price levels, price volatility and the long-term sustainability of the coffee sector. The Declaration is the result of a complex consensus building process which, in order to gain momentum, started with an initial group of coffee stakeholders but has now rapidly attracted interest from all the actors in the coffee sector.

The Declaration is set to become a global reference of Public-Private partnership to make coffee the most sustainable agribusiness value chain and beverage in the world for the benefit of all stakeholders – consumers, employees, suppliers, communities and shareholders.

The CEO and Global Leaders Forum, also to be broadcast live via web streaming, will provide a dynamic Davos-style format of interactive discussion with the audience across plenary and panel sessions with high-level government representatives from exporting and importing governments including Oumer Hassien, Minister of Agriculture of Ethiopia and  Pablo Anliker, Minister of Agriculture and Livestock of El Salvador as well as top government representatives of Colombia, Germany, and Honduras, and CEOs and top executives from industry leaders such as Illycaffè, Jacobs Douwe Egberts (JDE), Nestlé, Melitta, Mercon Coffee Corp, Olam, Starbucks, Sucafina, Strauss, Volcafe, among others.

It will also have representatives from largest coffee associations such as the Global Coffee Platform (GCP) and the Sustainable Coffee Challenge (SCC), and international and civil society organizations such Fairtrade, IDH, Rainforest Alliance and others.

The Forum will be moderated by Al Jazeera journalist Maryam Nemazee. Following the CGLF Forum, it is envisaged that the London Declaration will be endorsed by the 125th Session of the International Coffee Council, thus by all the governments of countries producing 98 percent of world coffee, and by the countries that import at least two-thirds of world coffee production for their processing industry and consumers.

The International Coffee Organization (ICO) to which Uganda subscribers as a coffee growing country, is a multilateral organisation supporting exporting and importing countries to improve the sustainability of the coffee sector. It provides a high level forum for all public and private stakeholders in the sector; official statistics on coffee production, trade and consumption; and support for the development and funding of technical cooperation projects and public-private partnerships.

Stories Continues after ad

Africans protesting against climate change, does the media care? 

Mr. Serwanja

 

 

 Last week the world once again turned its attention to climate change ahead of the United Nations General Assembly in New York. Millions peacefully protested on the streets of over 5000 cities across the globe against environmental degradation and green house emissions.

Africa was no exception. Kenya’s capital Nairobi was overwhelmed by the number of protesters holding placards with writings such as “Save our planet”, “There is no planet B” among others. South Africa, Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia and Nigeria equally had massive turn ups.

The message is loud and clear, that African leaders should pay attention to climate change. But so should the media in Africa. For long, climate change has been a phenomenon so far away from us often tagged as “a western problem” and yet reality is beginning to set in.

In many newsrooms across the continent, stories of climate change are a hard sale to the editors. It is no wonder that very few have made it to the front pages as stories on conflict, violence, corruption and politics dominate the headlines in both print and broadcast media.

In fact, the quantity and quality of climate change reportage in African media is uneven to level of threat it poses to the continent.  In its report titled ‘Least responsible, most affected, least informed’ the BBC World Service Trust made a scary conclusion that ““African citizens are at humanity’s climate change frontline, yet they are also among the least informed about human-induced global climate change, its causes and its consequences.”

Perhaps the data from the Reuters Institutes speaks louder with some figures.  Out of the 86,760 stories covered by 2 of Nigeria’s top news papers, The Guardian and Vanguard, only 79 stories were about climate change in the 6 months of the study. It is the same script but different cast for the results in South Africa for the publications in The Star and M and G newspapers. Out of 28,800 stories published, only 96 were associated with climate change.

This, therefore means that the continent’s response to climate change through behavioral change and adaptation will be limited since the media has failed on their key role of educating the public about this matter by not publishing enough about the stories.

Numbers aside, let us talk about the quality of reporting on climate change. Makerere University Associate professor Goretti Linda Nassage who has done extensive research on the media and climate change rightly noted in one of her papers that “The media in Uganda are not putting climate change into proper context to raise public awareness and influence engagement in the climate change debate”

Reality is that very few people in the general population read sci­entific reports, spe­cialist web­sites and blogs, or even follow the proceedings of the intergovernmental panel on climate change discussions every year. It therefore means that Newsrooms in Africa need to set aside a team of environmental reporters who need to break down the science to everyday living scenarios to bring the message of climate change home. If this is not done, then editor shouldn’t expect magic from a reporter on the general desk to decode the climate change messages in these conferences or reports in one day to do a great story.

Does the African media therefore have a role to play in the global action against climate change? Yes it does. So instead of just doing stories like “Thousands protest on the streets against climate change” which are often event driven, the media needs to take a deep dive into this subject by detailing how climate change is affecting us everyday and what we need to do revert its effects. If media in Africa keeps its audience in the dark, we may wake up when it is a little too late.

 

Solomon Serwanjja

Investigative Journalist

 

 

 

 

Stories Continues after ad

EAC declares Fridays as “Afrika Mashariki Fashion Day”

African couple in African attire

 

 

The East African Community (EAC) has declared Fridays as ‘Afrika Mashariki Fashion Day’ during which East Africans will wear attires manufactured in the region.

The 36th Extra-Ordinary Sectoral Council on Trade, Industry, Finance and Investment (SCTIFI) further declared the 1st Week of September an ‘Afrika Mashariki Fashion Week’ to be held annually as a Trade Fair and Exhibition of EAC designed textiles and garments.

The SCTIFI urged EAC Partner States that produce cotton to set up national cotton lint buffer stock mechanisms to ensure all year-round availability of locally produced cotton lint to spinning mills.

The Ministerial Session of the 36th SCTIFI which was chaired by Rwanda’s Minister for Trade and Industry, Ms. Soraya M. Hakuziyaremye, approved the Final Draft Cotton, Textile and Apparels (CTA) Strategy and the Implementation Roadmap.

In her opening remarks, Hakuziyaremye said that for the EAC region to reap maximum benefits from the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCTA), it was imperative to enhance the region’s productive capacity. Hakuziyaremye called for urgent implementation of a number of outstanding EAC Summit decisions and directives especially in the textile, leather and automotive industries, in addition to resolving Non-Tariff Barriers.

She reminded the Ministers that AfCTA Summit had directed that the implementation of the agreement should commence by 1st July, 2020 necessitating EAC Partner States to conclude their Tariff Offers by the agreed dates.

Other Ministers present at the meeting were Hon. Jean Marie Niyokindi (Minister for Trade and Industry, Burundi), Peter Munya (Minister for Industry, Trade and Cooperatives, Kenya),  Kafabusa Michael (Minister of State for Trade and Industry, Uganda), John Dor Majok (Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning, South Sudan), and Innocent Bashungwa (Minister for Industry and Trade, Tanzania).

The Ministers called on Partner States to give priority to the implementation of the Cotton, Textiles and Apparels (CTA) Strategy by providing budgets for the activities, as relevant to specific countries, in the 2020/2021 Financial Year.

The SCTIFI directed the Standards Committee to assess and advise on feasibility of the Pre-shipment Verification of Conformity (PVoC) of all imports of textiles and ready-made garments (RMGs) into the region, as a measure to control illicit imports of worn out or used textiles and garments.

The meeting further approved the Draft Leather and Leather Products Sector Strategy and the Implementation Roadmap, and urged Partner States to give priority to the implementation of the Strategy by including the activities, as relevant to each country, in the next Financial Year’s national budgets.

The Council was informed of case studies of investment in the leather and leather products in Vietnam and Ethiopia. Due to government support, Vietnam had become the second largest footwear exporter after China exporting more than 1 billion pairs of shoes and accounting for 7.4 per cent of global supply.

Ethiopia, on the other hand, has recently emerged as a world-class player in leather footwear due to its low cost skilled labour, improvements in the quality of its raw material supply, the stable business climate, and the establishment of special economic zones. The country is attracting an increasing number of investors who use the country as a production site targeting the EU and US markets. Shoes from Ethiopia are also increasingly gaining popularity in East Africa.

On Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs), the SCTIFI directed Partner States to eliminate all the outstanding NTBs from the EAC Time Bound Programme. The Ministers further directed the Secretariat to always schedule a one day session of Ministers with the East African Business Council and other Private Sector stakeholders before every SCTIFI to deliberate on issues of concern to the private sector including NTBs.

The recommendations of these engagements would then be escalated to the Council of Ministers and eventually the Summit. It was noted that among the causes of NTBs include: non-harmonisation of excise duty amongst Partner States; lack of a common framework for harmonisation of local content; multiple trade facilitation agencies; persistent stays of application; non-implementation of recommendations from studies and verification missions, and; non-recognition of standards quality marks.

On AfCTA, the SCTIFI agreed on a time-frame of 10 years for Category A products and 13 years for Category B products to be adopted by the EAC for tariff liberalization for the AfCTA as a customs union. Category A products refer to non-sensitive products to be liberalized first. Category B products, on the other hand, will be liberalized from the 6th year after the commencement of tariff dismantling.

 

 

Stories Continues after ad

AfDB approves $17.7m for first education project in South Sudan

South Sudanese pupils

 

 

The African Development Bank has approved a proposal for US$17.7 million to finance the first social sector project in South Sudan since the Bank’s engagement in the country in 2012. The project will increase access to improved basic education for children in the Upper Nile, Unity, Jonglei and Eastern Equatoria states and regions.

The project will improve access to primary education for 30,000 children through the rehabilitation and expansion of 35 primary schools, enhance the capacity of 2,000 teachers and rehabilitate two national teacher training institutes and ten county education centres. It will also provide water, sanitation and hygiene facilities, as well as furniture and learning materials; and build capacity for a better delivery of education services at primary level.

The project is guided by South Sudan’s national development strategy, the general education strategic Plan; the national girls’ education strategy; and the orientation of the Bank’s country strategy paper, which was recently extended to 2021. The strategies emphasise nation-building through capacity and infrastructure development.

The conflict in South Sudan has seriously affected socioeconomic development and compromised basic services infrastructure including education in South Sudan. More than 2.2 million children in South Sudan are out of school, and about 800 primary schools are either non-functional or partially functional.  South Sudan is in need of 23,000 primary school teachers by 2021, yet more than 75% of national teacher training institutes and county education centres are either not operating or partly operating. The quality of education is poor, with the primary completion rate estimated at 14%. Therefore, the Bank’s investment in basic education for the children of South Sudan will help to create the building blocks for a productive workforce and revitalised national development.

Acknowledging the timeliness of approval of this project, country manager for South Sudan, Benedict Kanu, said that “education is not only a powerful driver of development, and one of the strongest instruments for reducing poverty and improving peace and stability, but it is also the key to ending conflicts.” Kanu added that “rebuilding education systems during and after crisis education as is envisaged by the project is crucial in conflict and fragile situations because it will help to provide security, facilitate peacebuilding, and foster resilience.” He expressed the strong hope that “the project will help to inspire urgently needed change and stability for future generations of South Sudanese.”

Since 2012, the Bank has contributed more than $160.55 million in development aid across various sectors for South Sudan. The support has focused on capacity building and infrastructure development, with an emphasis on promoting peace, stability and state building.

Stories Continues after ad

BoU board wants top official Margaret Kasule out

BoU Legal Counsel Ms Margaret Kasule whose accused of misleading on Crane Bank Limited legal status.

 

 

A section of the Bank of Uganda (BoU) Board want head of legal department, Ms Margaret Kasule relieved of her duties due to unsatisfactory performance who , a reliable source within the institution has told this website.

“Some board members are wondering how Kasule was able to get that job that needs somebody who is very sharp and knowledgeable about Ugandan laws,” a senior official said, further saying that Kasule’s self-confidence has gone down since parliament launched a probe against BoU over the closure of commercial banks.

He said Kasule is supposed to be the institution’s authority on legal issues, such as drafting legal documents as well as shielding the institution from falling into situations where it is likely to attract legal suits. However, this department and Kasule in particular has failed to deliver on that mandate, costing BoU billions of shillings in legal costs.

The department and more so its head Ms Kasule has turned to be the worst performing due to many scandals and legal battles that BoU is fighting and many are as a result of Kasule not advising BoU as a professional in the legal field.

Members of the board say Kasule has relied so much on the external lawyers to do her job and as such her input is insignificant, this website was told. “They think that external lawyers from MMKAS and AF Mpanga Advocates took advantage of Kasule’s inexperience in legal matters to con BoU of billions of shillings in legal costs and advice,” the official said.

The official added that the two law firms, according to the BoU board, have been a curse rather than a blessing and that Kasule takes the biggest portion of the blame since she failed to check the tricks of the two law firms who were more interested in reaping money from BoU than giving counsel that would have helped BoU keep off from the recent scandals and legal battles.

For instance, when Mr John Muwanga, the Auditor General wanted to launch his audit into BoU over the closure of the banks, the institution would first frustrate him that the probe would amount to sub judice since there was a related case in court. That was the ill-advice of BoU’s legal department, though it would be upheld by the Solicitor General. It would take the courage of Speaker of Parliament Rebecca Kadaga to insist that the Auditor General probes BoU as the exercise had nothing to do with the case in court where BoU/Crane Bank In Receivership had sued Sudhir Ruparelia and Meera Investments Limited  for allegedly  swindling Crane Bank Limited of Sghs397 billion.

Further, the Auditor General in his special audit report observes that some of the documentation relating to Teefe Trust Bank specifically the inventory report, loan schedules, customer deposit schedules, statement of affairs and reports supporting assets and liabilities taken over by BoU was not availed him as some were reported missing. The job a serious legal department is to ensure that such documents are kept tightly in case of a legal suit. Yet Ms Kasule and her juniors in the legal department where all ignorant about the whereabouts of several documents during COSASE probe.

Kasule during COSASE surprised MPs when she told them that former Minister of Finance, the late Jehoash Mayanja Nkangi closed bank (names withheld) by way of issuing a press release. She would be challenged by the then COSASE Chairman Abdu Katuntu who reminded her that a press release is not a government document officially used in the closure of any institution.

Use of conflicted lawyers in BoU case

The Commercial court in December 2017 disqualified Bank of Uganda (BoU) lawyers from sh397 billion case involving Sudhir Ruparelia, citing conflict of interest. In his ruling, the head of the division, Justice David Kutosi Wangutusi stated that David Mpanga of A.F. Mpanga Advocates and Timothy Masembe of MMAKS Advocates acted in violation of the Advocates (Professional Conduct) regulations in representing BoU.

There is no one else to blame for this situation it’s BoU’s legal department and Kasule that should have done a due diligence on A.F Mpanga Advocated and MMAKS Advocates. Of concern is that taxpayers continue to lose money in such arrangements dues to carelessness of BoU’s legal department.

Crane Bank In Receivership suit against Sudhir and Meera Investment

Just weeks, Commercial Court judge, Justice David Kutosi Wangutusi ruled that Crane Bank In Receivership which sued Sudhir Ruparelia and Meera Investments Limited for Shs397 billion violated the law which does not give companies such circumstances to sue. Justice Wangutusi awarded Sudhir and Meera Investments Limited costs of the suit. It was upon BoU’s legal department to know that Crane Bank in Receivership had no right to sue, as per the existing law.

Kasule’s department also failed to let her bosses at BoU to know that that even if Crane Bank In Receivership had the right to sue, it had ceased to own property and not existence.

“That notwithstanding even if Crane Bank In Receivership could sue, by the 30th June 2017 when they filed the suit they were not in a position to do so. They had ceased to own property and their liabilities and assets had all been exhausted,” said the judge in his ruling.

The sum total is that the Respondent at the time it filed this suit was not in existence its lifetime having been terminated when it was surrendered to DFCU Bank whose consideration was the DFCU assumption of the Respondent’s liabilities which assumption was paid by conveying her assets to DFCU Bank, added the judge.

Interesting it is Kasule who swore an affidavit on behalf of BoU who helped Crane Bank In Receivership to lodge a case against Sudhir and Meera Investments. That decision by Kasule made the judge to award costs of the suit to Sudhir, which BoU has to pay. But we know BoU uses taxpayers’ purse. So we shall lose that money because of BoU’s legal department’s carelessness in handling legal issues.

“I am an adult female Uganda of sound mind and the Legal Counsel of Bank of Uganda which is the statutory receiver of Crane Bank Ltd in Receivership and I swear this affidavit in that capacity,” Kasule swearing an affidavit in Shs397 billion case.

From the foregoing Justice Wangutusi said: “There is no doubt that the suit was filed by Bank of Uganda. Since section 96 of the Financial Institutions Act insulated Crane Bank under Receivership from court proceedings, execution or other legal processes the person that should pay costs should be the person who instituted the suit and that is Bank of Uganda. This is so because Crane Bank in Receivership had no capacity to foot the costs and much so the Bank of Uganda that instituted the suit was aware of this incapacity.”

The Crane Bank case is just one example, shareholders of National Bank of Commerce and a few others have considered a legal battle to have their bank restored or be compensated. BoU’s legal department still will carry the blame for not advising rightly. The weakness of the department is the reason BoU relies more on the expensive external lawyers who dupe taxpayers. The question arises as to why Kasule still remains BoU legal counsel.

 

Stories Continues after ad

Museveni blasts opposition for celebrating indictment of Kayihura, says his alleged investments in USA would amount to treason

Museveni with then his blue eyed boy Gen. Kale Kayihura.

 

 

President Yoweri Museveni has castigated opposition leaders who continue to jubilate over the recent decision by the US government to indict former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Gen. Kale Kayihura and members of his family.

In his latest message to Uganans, Museveni says: “It is most interesting to see how some of the elements of the Opposition are jubilating about some authorities in the USA who have recently declared that General Kale and some members of his family will not be allowed to enter the USA in case they want to travel there… I should, first of all, say that, that excitement among some elements of the Opposition shows the poor quality of their spectacles when it comes to issues of Africa and Uganda.”

He continues: “Why do they think that going to the USA or, indeed, any non-African country is so important that if you are not allowed there, it will amount to a painful punishment? I know of no Country that is more beautiful than Uganda on Earth Planet. It is actually a sacrifice for me to visit any non-African country on account of bad weather, strange foods etc.”

In his message, Museveni castigated Kayihura after learning that the General has investments in USA. “What would be disappointing is to hear that Kale had investments in the USA that his children go to see. That would be treason.  Investments in the USA when Uganda needs investments? I do not have and will never have a single investment outside Uganda; possibly, for some sentimental reasons, I could consider investing in Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda…

He says, “It is … “inexcusable that at a time when Africa is still struggling to stand up, still with deficits in many areas, that the African elite would transfer money, again, to the West.”

 

Below is Museveni’s latest message to Ugandans;

Fellow Ugandans and, especially, the Bazzukulu

It says, in the Church of Uganda Prayer Book, on page 5, as follows: “They left undone what they ought to have done and they did that they ought not to have done and there is no truth in them”. In Runyakore, it says: “Bakareka ebibashemereire kukora, bakora ebibatashemereire kukora, n’amazima tigari muribo”. It is most interesting to see how some of the elements of the Opposition are jubilating about some authorities in the USA who have recently declared that General Kale and some members of his family will not be allowed to enter the USA in case they want to travel there.

Before I comment on the action of the USA Govt in the matter of Kale, I should, first of all, say that, that excitement among some elements of the Opposition shows the poor quality of their spectacles when it comes to issues of Africa and Uganda. Why do they think that going to the USA or, indeed, any non-African country is so important that if you are not allowed there, it will amount to a painful punishment? I know of no Country that is more beautiful than Uganda on Earth Planet. It is actually a sacrifice for me to visit any non-African country on account of bad weather, strange foods etc.

I, however, visit those foreign countries as my duty prescribes to create friendships for Uganda, especially for business, security co-operation etc. Even with the issue of business and security co-operation, our primary area of interest is Africa.

The other parts of the World are additional.  Africa needs those parts of the World and they need Africa. Otherwise, at a personal level, I go to foreign, non-African destinations for friendship, not for my primary obligation to family or Country.

Why do I say this? The first time I visited the USA in October 1987, on the invitation of President Reagan, I was 43 years old and my personal journey had already reached the climax as President of Uganda. In the previous 43 years, I had grown up in Africa, studied in Africa, fought in Africa, failed in Africa and succeeded in Africa. Where in Africa? In: Uganda, Tanzania, Mozambique, Zambia and Kenya.

On two occasions, I also passed through Rwanda and Burundi and visited Mobutu once in Gbadolite. Why did President Reagan invite me? He must have heard that this totally African- made product, known as General of the Resistance, Yoweri Museveni, is of some value. Indeed, we have helped one another with the Western Countries in economy, health (e.g. Aids and Ebola), security etc. In some of the situations, Uganda stood alone or nearly alone. Some examples: the Sudan under Hassan Tourabi when they backed ADF and LRA; Somalia when everybody, including the Americans, feared to go there; the Rwanda crisis; etc. etc. Actually, for most of the 43 years before I visited President Reagan, the Western Countries suspected us as “Marxists”, “Communists” etc. That, however, did not stop us from succeeding in Liberating our Country.  Some of the Western and some of the Eastern Countries, not to mention the Arab countries, supported Idi Amin and those Govts. Actually, Idi Amin came to power with the support of the Western Countries. We opposed Idi Amin and their support for him and succeeded with the support of African Countries.

By 1950, China was number 45 in the hierarchy of development in terms of the size of GDP. In the 70 years since that time, China is now the second biggest economy in the World and they are continuing to grow. However, in those 70 years, China has fought with the Western Countries in Korea (1950- 53); they have been on opposite sides in the War in Vietnam (1954- 1975); China backed us in our anti- colonial wars in Africa, while many of the Western Countries were supporting our enemies (in Mozambique, Angola, South Africa, Namibia, Rhodesia, Guinea-Bissau, Mau Mau); etc etc.

Mao Tse Tung never visited any Western Country even once in all his life.  I think he visited Moscow two times. Yet, the China he led is now one of the most successful stories of the modern World.

Therefore, to hear leaders of national Political Parties jubilating that a Ugandan is barred from entering the USA is very good news for the NRM because, as always, it will be very easy for us to show the Ugandans and Africans that “they have left undone what they ought to have done and have done what they ought not to have done and there is no truth in them”.

Regarding the Foreign Govts which are fond of using these types of approach, that is their choice. It is really none of our business.  It is their country and they are right to run it the way they want.

However, for Kale or other Ugandans who are suspected to have made mistakes, they will always be handled in Uganda.  That is why we shall never hand any Ugandan to, for instance, the Court in The Hague- the ICC. Kale is already facing whatever mistakes he is suspected to have committed in our Courts. What value addition is, then, there from external actors? In co-operation in, for instance, Defense matters, some of the Western Countries tried to tell us which soldiers should not be selected for courses in their countries and we rejected that position by stopping all training in those countries.  We built the UPDF by our own means from scratch, based on the genuine sentiments of our People as you can see whenever there is a recruitment exercise. Outsiders can contribute in a manner acceptable to us. Otherwise, we are self- sufficient in capacity building as we have always been.

What would be disappointing is to hear that Kale had investments in the USA that his children go to see. That would be treason.  Investments in the USA when Uganda needs investments? I do not have and will never have a single investment outside Uganda; possibly, for some sentimental reasons, I could consider investing in Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda etc. – African countries.  However, for non- African Countries: “No”, “Never”. Why? It is the African slave labour during 300 years of slavery, the African resources during the colonial times and the African resources during neo- colonial times that contributed greatly to the prosperity of those countries to the detriment of Africa (How Europe under- developed Africa- Walter Rodney).

It is therefore, inexcusable that at a time when Africa is still struggling to stand up, still with deficits in many areas, that the African elite would transfer money, again, to the West. Culturally, now, the populations in the Western Countries are something akin to relatives: we all speak English or French or whatever; many of us are Christians; we share books written by different Authors; etc etc.

When Africa is strong, she will come to the aid of Europe and the USA. However, that time is not now. On my part, the only time I opened a bank account outside Uganda, was in a Bank in Gothenburg, Sweden, where I deposited the US $ 120,000 that was donated to the NRM by the Late Max Rohrer of Roko. Elizabeth Bagaya also brought US $ 100,000 from Abiola. I do not remember whether I deposited it there also.  This was in 1985.

Also Mzee Rusiita from London may have brought some contribution. Otherwise, it is sacrilege for Africans to continue to contribute to the welfare of others to Africa’s detriment.

I am sorry for this diversion.  I have not responded to the messages of the Bazzukulu and other Ugandans that they sent in response to my earlier ones, and those wishing me well on my birthday. I will do so soon. Thank you all for wishing me good luck

Stories Continues after ad

UPDF High command meets over Gen. Kayihura, Col. Kaka

Col. Frank Kaka Bagyenda who has been appointed Uganda's Ambassador to Angola.

 

The UPDF High Command held a meeting at State House in Entebbe to discuss different issues including the fate of the former of Inspector General of Police, Gen Kale Kayihura who facing United States sanctions over alleged human rights abuses.

According to security sources, the top army organ, will discuss President Museveni’s directive to the Internal Security Organisation to close all the safe houses allegedly used by ISO to torture people.

It is said that President Museveni is furious with ISO boss Col Kaka Bagyenda who has returned use safe houses to torture people.

After today’s meeting the UPDF Army Council will also meet tomorrow to discuss the same agenda. Col. Kaka has been under pressure from a section of Members of Parliament on human rights committee that has been investigating alleged torture in safe houses. However, ISO says these aren’t torture chambers but rather holding cells.

Senior investigative journalist Andrew Mwenda has also vowed to expose the alleged rot in Internal Security Organisation.

Stories Continues after ad

Rajni Tailor arrested for issuing bouncing cheques

Mr. Rajni at police making a statement and below being ushered in.

 

 

Former Buganda kingdom State Minister for Economic Planning Rajni Tailor – Minister of State for Economic Planning and Economic Development Rajni Tailor has been arrested and locked at police for issuing bounced cheques.

Tailors tricks got exposed after several Indian community members dragged him to police for failure to pay back hundreds of dollars which the community members have been lending to him.

His businesses have remained struggling and this could be the reason he is doing badly

Stories Continues after ad

How idea people can transform into visionary leaders

Martin Zwilling

 

By Martin Zwilling

 

A popular approach for aspiring entrepreneurs these days seems to be to corner anyone who will listen, with a pitch on their current “million dollar idea.” The initial monologue usually ends with the question “How much money do you think this is worth?” In my opinion, ideas are a commodity, and are really not worth much, outside the context of a visionary leader who can execute.

Over the past couple of decades, experts have perfected the art of brainstorming and other idea-generation techniques. Executives and investors are now increasingly exposed to a wealth of ideas. The result is that ideas are no longer in short supply, and no longer a differentiator in competition.

Visionary execution, on the other hand, is not so common. A visionary is someone who can make sense out of the wealth of ideas, and weave together a plan for implementation that will make a difference in the world. Elon Musk, for example, likely receives thousands of ideas from friends, but he has been able to focus a few of these into initiatives that demonstrate real innovation.

What separates an idea person from a visionary leader? Most experts agree that a visionary leader not only has ideas, but also has a vision of where these ideas can lead, with strong core values, key relationships, and demonstrates innovative actions, as follows:

Commitment to core values. Visionary leaders radiate a sense of energy, strong will, and personal integrity. This usually results in a focus on multiple related ideas, leading to real innovation, rather than bouncing from one idea to the next, looking for the Holy Grail.

Positive inspirational communication. People with vision usually start by communicating an inspirational picture of the future, and then integrating individual innovative ideas into this fabric, and show how to get there. The best ones can make the impossible look easy, so everyone, including investors, line up to commit.

Build strong relationships with strong people. Great relationships are key to every leader. They see people as their greatest asset, and listen as well as talk. Theirs is not the autocratic style of leadership, which tells people what to do and dominates them, but a style which treats partners, investors, and customers as family.

Willing to take bold actions. These actions somehow always seem to embody a balance of rational (right brain) and intuitive (left brain) functions. Visionaries are often “outside the box” of conventional approaches and move toward long-term change and innovation. They are proactive and anticipate business change, rather than reactive to events.

Radiate charisma. People with a real vision can communicate ideas with almost a spiritual charisma that energizes people around them to go a step beyond normal boundaries, to solve a technical problem, sign on as a team member, or invest resources, when conventional wisdom would suggest otherwise.

Every investor wants to fund the true visionary leader, but the truth is that these people often don’t need funding, or don’t ask for it. The best investor pitch, then, is to sell the vision with such conviction that people want to be a part of it, with their money, their skills, or whatever they can bring to the table.

But not every entrepreneur has to be a visionary. There is still plenty of room for incremental improvements, and creativity in providing solutions to short-term problems. This is really the realm of bootstrapped startups, and a small segment of the angel investor community that is looking for a “quick hit” with a quick return.

So my message to entrepreneurs is to tune your approach and your expectations accordingly. I’m always impressed with entrepreneurs who pitch how they plan to bootstrap an idea, but if you need a million dollars, you better be able to communicate and lead with a vision.

 

The writer is a veteran startup mentor, executive, blogger, author, tech professional, professor, and investor. Published on Forbes, Entrepreneur, Inc, Huffington Post, among others.

Stories Continues after ad

URA commends Ruparelia Group for Shs30m worth of assorted services

Chairman of Ruparelia Group, Mr. Sudhir Ruparelia.

The Uganda Revenue Authority (URA), has appreciated Ruparelia Group of Companies for giving back to the taxpayer, assorted services worth Shs30 million during the Taxpayers Appreciation Week take place from September 25-27, 2019 at Kololo Independence Grounds in Kampala.

Ruparelia Group whose Chairman is Sudhir Ruparelia is mainly involved in education, real estate development and management, hotels, resorts, floriculture and broadcasting. Sudhir Ruparelia, the Group’s founder and chairman, is the majority shareholder in the companies that comprise the group

Some of the companies include: Crane Management Services Limited – Kampala, Dehli Public International SchoolNaguru, Kampala, Goldstar Insurance Company Limited – Kampala, Kabira Country Club – Bukoto, Kampala, Kampala International School UgandaKampala Parents’ SchoolKampala Speke Hotel – Kampala, Meera Investments Limited – Kampala, Munyonyo Commonwealth Resort – Munyonyo, Premier Roses Limited – Entebbe and Rosebud Limited – Entebbe.

Other companies under the Ruparelia Group include; Sanyu FM 88.2 – Kampala, Speke Apartments Limited – Kampala, Speke Resort and Conference Center – Munyonyo, Kampala, Tourist Hotel  Kampala, Victoria University Uganda , Premier Recruitment Limited,

The group owns commercial and real estate interests in RwandaSouth Sudan, the United Kingdom, and the United Arab Emirates.

The companies under Ruparelia Group are one of the top taxpayers in Uganda. For instance, Meera Investments Limited tops the list of 25 compliant companies that were ranked best by the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) in paying rental income tax in the financial year 208/19 that saw the Authority beat the target by Shs258.89 billion to collect a total of Shs16.6 trillion in taxes to government.

Stories Continues after ad