Stanbic Bank
Stanbic Bank
20 C
Kampala
Stanbic Bank
Stanbic Bank
Home Blog Page 1303

FUFA to host three high profile UEFA Officials

Head of International Relations football operations UEFA - Eva Pasquier

The Federation of Uganda Football Associations (FUFA) will host three top UEFA officials from 8th to 13th May 2019.

The visiting officials are UEFA Head of International Relations football operations specialist Eva Pasquier and two Consultants Stewart Reagan-former CEO of the Scottish Football Association and Ken MacLeod.

The football officials are coming under an international programme called UEFA ASSIST that addresses the needs of national associations and confederations outside Europe with the aim of increasing solidarity and enhance football development and knowledge sharing.

With FUFA keeping track on its 5 year strategic plan based on the 8 key focus areas, the visit comes at an opportune moment when football knowledge, ideas and guidance will be shared about Ugandan football learning on best practices how the beautiful game is administered in Europe.

It will be the first time for any African country to host the UEFA ASSIST official and also benefit from the programme.

During their visit, the football oficials will hold meetings with the FUFA President, Government, Executive Committee Members, FUFA CEO, Secretariat staff, Clubs, Uganda Cranes coach, fans, sponsors and media.

“We hope to benefit a lot from the visit of UEFA officials as we expect to learn more on modern governance principles especially when they meet the various key stakeholders in the game. The same knowledge will be shared by the people who are the nucleus of the game in the 8 football regions” said FUFA CEO Edgar Watson.

FUFA’s focus areas are; Governance, Development, Infrastructure, National teams, Competitions, Marketing and Communications, Finance and Administration, Membership.

About UEFA ASSIST:

UEFA ASSIST, is an international programme that addresses the needs of national associations and confederations outside Europe with the aim of increasing solidarity and enhance football development and knowledge sharing.

The main scope of UEFA ASSIST is essentially to share knowledge and best practices to help UEFA’s sister confederations to develop and strengthen football within their respective territories. UEFA ASSIST is designed to provide practical rather than financial assistance and to offer support through development activities. – Story and information provided by the Fufa website (fufa.co.ug)

UEFA ASSIST is composed of four pillars, each providing specific support to member associations and confederations worldwide:

Education and knowledge sharing

Development of youth football

Support of infrastructure projects

UEFA national association support programmes

Stories Continues after ad

Five key drivers for creating a board for your startup

Martin Zwilling

By Martin Zwilling

Many entrepreneurs I know are confused by definition and need for an Advisory Board versus a Board of Directors. Some view both of these as a waste of time and burden on the CEO, while other founders surround themselves with insiders and cronies in an attempt to expedite and add credibility to their own interests. I suggest a few simple considerations will clarify the alternatives.

By definition, Advisory Boards are voluntary and have no fiduciary responsibility. Yet I suggest a small one has value for every startup, starting at inception, prior to a major investor or key business scaling initiative. This Advisory Board is a good test drive for the more formal Board of Directors required later, when going public (IPO) or the entrance of venture capital investors.

In all cases, board members should be selected individually for their ability to independently add value to the expertise and experience of the management team, with no obligation or intent to add weight to internal views. The details of these considerations are outlined in a classic book, “The Board Book,” by Board expert and founder of The Board Institute, Susan F. Shultz.

Shultz provides a set of considerations that I recommend to every entrepreneur for deciding when and how to create the board that has the most value to a specific CEO and a specific business. These considerations include the following:

Are you looking for advice or a boss? Most founders and CEOs will not voluntarily establish a formal Board of Directors, unless they are trying to attract a major investor, preparing for an IPO, or planning for an acquisition. As an alternative, every CEO needs an Advisory Board to help them grow, which they can ignore or fire at their pleasure.

How much are you willing to spend on your board? Advisory Board members often serve for a nominal retainer, or one percent of the equity, whereas Directors for even a small company would expect at least a five-digit retainer, plus meeting expenses. Also expect that much more of your time will be required to sustain a Board of Directors.

What role do you want in selecting board members? Board of Directors members must be formally elected by stockholder votes for a stated term. Obviously, a CEO can recommend directors, but CEOs directly select Advisors, and they are replaced as interests and needs change. Legally, Directors are accountable for corporate conduct.

Do you expect involvement in company operations? Advisory Board members rarely get involved in operational roles versus strategic issues, while specific Directors often spend much time on executive compensation, processes to satisfy regulatory requirements, and reviews of budgets, acquisition proposals, and major policy changes.

How many board members need you work with? A Board of Directors must represent all constituents, so it often grows to ten or even twenty members, although I recommend keeping the numbers uneven (to eliminate tie votes), and less than ten. For Advisory Boards, I recommend three to five as max, to limit costs and time spent for support.

The challenge is to avoid the mistakes that can compromise any Board, advisory or formal, in its independence or effectiveness to the business. Shultz discusses many of these, but here are a few which are the most common in my experience:

Failure to focus strategically rather than tactically. Most stockholders think only about the next quarter, and most CEOs worry about short-term survival. Since Boards are a function of both of these, it’s hard to find boards able and willing to keep a proactive focus on strategy. They tell you what you need to hear, not what you want to hear.

Too many beholding insiders, friends, and family. Insiders will tell you what you want to hear. Their allegiance, sensitivity to rank, and familial biases make open discussions difficult, and interlocking directorships set up too many situations where directors work for favors from each other, or work against each other due to non-business issues.

Lack of involvement and leadership by the CEO. Even with all the right people on the Board, it’s still the CEO who sets the culture, drives the focus, and makes the difference. The best CEOs balance the focus between strategy and selected current issues. They stay in touch, transparently provide info, and make Board recommendations happen.

Thus, it is my view that every entrepreneur and every business needs at least a couple of outside advisors, if not a formal Board of Directors. As an angel investor, I judge readiness for investment by their presence or absence, by the CEO’s relationship with them, and by the quality of the advisors. It’s a resource that you can’t afford to ignore if you intend to stay competitive today.

The writer is a veteran startup mentor, executive, blogger, author, tech professional, professor, and investor. Published on Forbes, Entrepreneur, Inc, Huffington Post.

Stories Continues after ad

Food, beverage companies commit to WHO trans fat elimination goal

Beverages

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has welcomed the commitment by the International Food and Beverage Alliance (IFBA) to align with the WHO target to eliminate industrially produced trans fat from the global food supply by 2023.

WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recently met with IFBA representatives, including chief executive officers from several of the 12 companies comprising the alliance to discuss actions to take to eliminate industrial trans fats, and reduce salt, sugar and saturated fats in processed foods.

The meeting also stressed the value of regulatory action on labelling, marketing and called industry to full adherence to the WHO Code of marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes.

“The commitment made by IFBA is in line with WHO’s target to eliminate industrial trans fat from the global food supply by 2023,” Dr Tedros said. “WHO will be monitoring the next steps to be taken by companies to help ensure the commitment is realized.”

Of particular note was the decision to by IFBA members to ensure that the amount of industrial trans fat (iTFA) in their products does not exceed 2 g of iTFA per 100 g fat/oil globally by 2023. This is in line with the WHO’s objective and recommendations of its REPLACE action package, which was developed and launched in 2018.

“Eliminating industrially-produced trans fat is one of the simplest and most effective ways to save lives and create a healthier food supply,” added Dr Tedros.

In line with the REPLACE initiative, WHO has called on all food producers and oil and fat manufacturers, not only IFBA members, to commit to elimination of industrial trans fat from the global food supply.

Trans fat intake is responsible for over 500,000 deaths from coronary heart disease each year globally.

Stories Continues after ad

Tackling corruption in gov’t

Corruption is bad

By Vitor Gaspar, Paolo Mauro and Paulo Medas

No country is immune to corruption. The abuse of public office for private gain erodes people’s trust in government and institutions, makes public policies less effective and fair, and siphons taxpayers’ money away from schools, roads, and hospitals.

While the wasted money is important, the cost is about much more. Corruption corrodes the government’s ability to help grow the economy in a way that benefits all citizens.

But the political will to build strong and transparent institutions can turn the tide against corruption. In our new Fiscal Monitor, we shine a light on fiscal institutions and policies, like tax administration or procurement practices, and show how they can fight corruption.

Corruption helps evade taxes

We analyze more than 180 countries and find that more corrupt countries collect fewer taxes, as people pay bribes to avoid them, including through tax loopholes designed in exchange for kickbacks. Also, when taxpayers believe their governments are corrupt, they are more likely to evade paying taxes.

We show that overall, the least corrupt governments collect 4 percent of GDP more in tax revenues than countries at the same level of economic development with the highest levels of corruption.

A few countries’ reforms generated even higher revenues. Georgia, for example, reduced corruption significantly and tax revenues more than doubled, rising by 13 percentage points of GDP between 2003 and 2008. Rwanda’s reforms to fight corruption since the mid-1990s bore fruit, and tax revenues increased by 6 percentage points of GDP.

Corruption also prevents people from benefiting fully from the wealth created by their country’s natural resources. Because the exploration of oil or mining generates huge profits, it creates strong incentives for corruption. Our research shows that resource-rich countries, on average, have weaker institutions and higher corruption.

Corruption wastes taxpayers’ money

The Fiscal Monitor shows that countries with lower levels of perceived corruption have significantly less waste in public investment projects. We estimate that the most corrupt emerging market economies waste twice as much money as the least corrupt ones.

Governments waste taxpayers’ money when they spend it on cost overruns due to kickbacks or bid rigging in public procurement. So, when a country is less corrupt, it invests money more efficiently and fairly.

Corruption also distorts government priorities.

For example, among low-income countries, the share of the budget dedicated to education and health is one-third lower in more corrupt countries. It also impacts the effectiveness of social spending. In more corrupt countries school-age students have lower test scores.

Corruption is also a problem in state-owned enterprises, such as some countries’ oil companies, and public utilities like electric and water companies. Our analysis suggests that these enterprises are less efficient in countries with high levels of corruption.

Where there is political will, there is a way

Fighting corruption requires political will to create strong fiscal institutions that promote integrity and accountability throughout the public sector.

Based on the research, here are some lessons for countries to help them build effective institutions that curb vulnerabilities to corruption:

Invest in high levels of transparency and independent external scrutiny. This allows audit agencies and the public at large to provide effective oversight. For example, Colombia, Costa Rica, and Paraguay are using an online platform that allows citizens to monitor the physical and financial progress of investment projects. Norway has developed a high standard of transparency to manage its natural resources. Our analysis also shows that a free press enhances the benefits of fiscal transparency. In Brazil, the results of audits impacted the reelection prospects of officials suspected of misuse of public money, but the impact was greater in areas with local radio stations.

Reform institutions. The chances for success are greater when countries design reforms to tackle corruption from all angles. For example, reforms to tax administration will have a greater payoff if tax laws are simpler and they reduce officials’ scope for discretion. To help countries, the IMF has built comprehensive diagnostics on the quality of fiscal institutions, including public investment management, revenue administration, and fiscal transparency.

Build a professional civil service. Transparent, merit-based hiring and pay reduce the opportunities for corruption. The heads of agencies, ministries, and public enterprises must promote ethical behavior by setting a clear tone at the top.

Keep pace with new challenges as technology and opportunities for wrongdoing evolve. Focus on areas of higher risk—such as procurement, revenue administration, and management of natural resources—as well as effective internal controls. In Chile and Korea, for example, electronic procurement systems have been powerful tools to curtail corruption by promoting transparency and improving competition.

More cooperation to fight corruption. Countries can also join efforts to make it harder for corruption to cross borders. For example, more than 40 countries have already made it a crime for their companies to pay bribes to gain business abroad under the OECD anti-corruption convention. Countries can also aggressively pursue anti–money laundering activities and reduce transnational opportunities to hide corrupt money in opaque financial centers.

Curbing corruption is a challenge that requires persevering on many fronts, but one that pays huge dividends. It starts with political will, continuously strengthening institutions to promote integrity and accountability, and global cooperation.

The writers work with IMF

Attachments area

Stories Continues after ad

Senior State Attorney sexually harassed, accuses Solicitor General of not helping her

Samantha Mwesigye

Samantha Mwesigye, Senior State Attorney with the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affair, has revealed she has been sexually harassed by a male supervisor in the ministry even though she could not name her tormentor.

Ms Mwesigye said that last she approached the Office of the Solicitor General for help, though up now nothing has been done. “In September 2018, I made a formal sexual harassment complaint to the Solicitor General. But up to now, nothing has been done,” she said Thursday Morning

“I’m talking about harassment that has taken over a decade. While I was at Clerkship, this one gentleman harassed me in various ways. In 2007, I joined the ministry as a full employee. He would then just make comments,” she said while appearing on NBS Morning Breeze segment.

The official said It was in 2009 that the senior male colleague starting making sexual advances toward her. “In 2009 that he sat me down and put his point across, saying I’m a grown-up who pretended not to understand his advances. I’ve been victimised over and over but what upsets me most is that I was never able to speak up,” she said.

Just last year, I had dental issues that would cost about Shs2.5 million. This particular gentleman, who is my supervisor clearly told me that it was very little money. All I had to do was sleep with him,” she cried.

“In 2018, I had a friend who encouraged me to speak out because silence just leads him on. I sent this gentleman an email regarding how he’s made me feel over the decade. After I sent him this email, he called a department meeting and ridiculed me in front of everyone. He asked me to read the email I had sent him. All through the meeting, it was about me. That was it for me,” she said.

When asked why she declined to respond to the gentleman’s advances, she said: “No. I simply wasn’t interested in him. I don’t know why it’s a prerogative for me to choose who I relate with. Judges are as well being sexually harassed. This broke my heart.”

Stories Continues after ad

FUFA launches Primary Schools football championship

Uganda’s football governing body FUFA has today launched the Primary Schools Championship and named it ‘Odilo’.

The Championship is code-named Odilo – meaning a ball in the Alur and Luo communities.

The tournament was launched by the Under Secretary Ministry of Education and Sports Aggrey David Kibenge, who was Chief Guest, together with the FUFA President Eng. Moses Magogo in a press conference at FUFA House in Mengo on Wednesday morning.

Magogo noted that it is the federation’s strategy to achieve its Vision of becoming the number one football nation in Africa on and off the field.

“We can only achieve our vision by following procedures laid down for developing grassroots football. There is no shortcut to football development. We take responsibility to create the category of U15 so that we can track these players.” Magogo noted

“The top clubs in Europe can only recruit players at the age of 17 to take them to the academies and prepare them for the bigger stage. Uganda is endowed with plenty of talent which is diverse. The new Championship unveiled today is looking at the categorisation of the players below the age of thirteen years,” the FUFA boss added.

Kibenge expressed his delight to witness the ceremony and applauded FUFA under Magogo’s leadership for the milestones achieved so far in Ugandan football during his tenure so far.

“I thank God for this morning of unveiling such a wonderful football product. It is a game changer. I would like to congratulate FUFA and Eng. Moses Magogo for the vision to Ugandan football and all the milestones achieved. It is a project that was overdue.” The Under Secretary Ministry of Education and Sports said.

“I am glad that FUFA will take the lead charge in the competitions and technical expertise will be applied. Such competitions have values attached to them but need technical expertise which FUFA provides. We shall engage all stakeholders to take part and I speak with authority that the Ministry will support these competitions.” He added

Registration is in progress and 400 primary schools have already confirmed participation. Deadline for registration is Wednesday 15th May 2019.

The Championship will kick off 5th June 2019 at various grounds to determine District Champions before they feature at the Regional level.

The National Finals will be played by the eight Regional Primary Schools Winners at the FUFA Technical Centre, Njeru.

A committee to be headed by FUFA 1st Vice President Justus Mugisha, will be in charge of the championship. It also has the 2nd Vice President at FUFA Darius Mugoye, Hajji Abdu Sekabira Lukooya, John Bosco Masiko, Farouk Kigongo and one representative from the Ministry of Education and Sports.

Stories Continues after ad

Unfollow Manchester United! Furious fans start movement to unfollow club on Twitter due to poor results

Manchester-United-players

Manchester United fans have started a campaign against the club’s official Twitter account following recent poor results – seeing United lose thousands of followers.

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s side have two wins in the last ten games but Sunday’s draw against already relegated Huddersfield Town has seen some supporters take matters into their own hands to hurt the club off the pitch.

Having officially missed out on a top four finish – and therefore Champions League football for next season – disgruntled supporters rallied together on social media.

The plan for the campaign was put forward on Twitter by The Man Utd Way – an account which boasts 81,500 followers.

They wrote: ‘We aren’t a social media experiment. We aren’t an advertising agency.

‘We want to see @ManUtd return to the football club we once were and if tourists won’t stop going to Old Trafford, make your voices heard on here. I’ve been asked to help back the hashtag. #UnfollowManUnited’

Supporters face a real struggle to make a recognisable difference given the club have amassed 19.2million followers since joining the social media site.

United have become a powerhouse off the pitch with the club a market leader in generating commercial revenue through brand deals, attraction of individual players and their global reach given the size of the club.

On the pitch United have regressed since the departure of legendary boss Sir Alex Ferguson and some supporters have accused the club’s hierarchy of placing more emphasis on exploits off the field, rather than on it.

While some United supporters – and a host from rival clubs – ridiculed the notion of damaging the club on social media by unfollowing the Twitter account, it quickly began to gain support.

One fan wrote: ‘#UnfollowManUnited still going down. Keep the trend going guys keep retweeting and tweeting using this hashtag.’

Another added: ‘All or nothing now it seems #UnfollowManUnited’.

While players are taking the brunt of responsibility for failings in the Premier League and Champions League, CEO Ed Woodward is facing further scrutiny for the side’s continued failings.

He has helped deliver players such as Fred, Romelu Lukaku, Paul Pogba and Alexis Sanchez and yet the club’s performances have failed to bridge the gap to Manchester City and Liverpool, both of which are pushing for the title. – story via Daily Mail UK

Stories Continues after ad

Lessons for Uganda on how Britain became the world’s largest exporter of medical marijuana

Marijuana

In the investment houses of Mayfair, bullish analysts are excited about the prospect of a ‘green rush’

If you were looking for an international drugs empire, Downham Market would not be the first place you’d think of. With a population of around 10,000, this sleepy Fenland town is probably about as typical as they come — typical, that is, apart from the smell.

It was around two years ago that residents first noticed it: a distinctive pungent scent which seemed to hang on the wind before eventually engulfing the town for several days. Now locals say the gusts come and go. But when the odour first appeared, it was so strong that at least one resident phoned the police to complain about feeling nauseous.

It turned out that the smell was coming from an 18-hectare cannabis plantation housed in some nearby industrial greenhouses. But this was no black market operation: the premises were owned by British Sugar and the cannabis was being grown under licence from the Home Office. Nor was it a small gig: experts say that the Downham Market operation (which continues to this day) probably produces more than 90 tonnes of legal cannabis each year.

Of course, cannabis remains a strictly prohibited substance in Britain, having been upgraded to a class B drug (with possession punishable by five years in prison) by the last Labour government. How, then, is a FTSE 100 company involved in harvesting gargantuan amounts of cannabis in the middle of East Anglia?

The truth is that Britain has a thriving ‘legal’ cannabis industry, which exists alongside the black market. It uses Home Office permissions, as well as some legal loopholes, to generate hundreds of millions of pounds in revenue each year — with full support from the British government, which takes a cut from the proceeds. Last year, a UN report revealed that the success of this venture had made Britain the biggest producer and exporter of legal cannabis in the world.

So when did it all begin? In 1998 a British biotech company called GW Pharmaceuticals was approved by the Home Office to conduct clinical trials on using weed to help patients living with the most serious types of Multiple Sclerosis. For the first time, the British press began to talk about so-called ‘medical marijuana’.

In the 20 years since then, GW Pharmaceuticals has developed two of the world’s most successful cannabis-based drugs, including Epidiolex — the first of its kind to win FDA-approval in the US (sending GW’s shares into orbit in the process). Its current valuation is more than £3 billion. Good news for its largest shareholder, Capital Group, a US-based investment house which also employs Philip May, the Prime Minister’s husband, at its plush London offices.

In 2016, following exponential growth of the medical marijuana industry in the United States, the Home Office approved a deal to allow GW Pharmaceuticals to expand its cannabis empire using British Sugar’s greenhouse facilities. So the government was encouraging medical cannabis, but still banning it. This embarrassing situation was highlighted in an unexpected way a year ago when the government appointed a new drugs minister, Victoria Atkins, who, as eagle-eyed bloggers pointed out, is married to the managing director of British Sugar. Red-faced, the minister formally excused herself from answering any questions on marijuana policy.

For supporters of medical marijuana, this was galling given the Home Office’s historic track record in blocking UK patients with chronic conditions from accessing cannabis–based medicines, usually on the basis that marijuana had no medical value whatsoever. Now here was a drugs minister whose husband was involved in the production of medical marijuana.

These contradictions are growing harder for the government to ignore. Six months ago the mother of Billy Caldwell, a severely epileptic boy from Northern Ireland, returned from America bringing cannabis oils for his treatment. The police set out to arrest her at the airport, and had to be stopped by Sajid Javid, the Home Secretary, who could imagine the headlines.

Although the oil is legal in 30 countries, Home Office officials wanted to impound the supply. At one point, a customs official was sent to the hospital to guard the oil against theft. It was a farce that demonstrated the law needed to change. Marijuana usage is now allowed in rare cases where authorities are satisfied there is an ‘unmet special clinical need’. Despite this, there are no plans to make medicines like Epidiolex, the patented drug which makes millions for GW Pharmaceuticals, available in Britain.

GW Pharmaceuticals and its shareholders aren’t the only ones making money from inconsistencies in the UK’s cannabis laws. In the investment houses of Mayfair, bullish analysts speak of the ‘green rush’ and of ‘Big Marijuana’. One industry research group, Prohibition Partners, has estimated that a British medical marijuana market would be worth £8 billion a year. Blue-chip investors, having already cashed in on developments in America, are understandably excited.

It’s not just medical marijuana which is on the rise in Britain: a range of new lifestyle products, freely available in high street shops and supermarkets, are quickly building a new consumer industry for so-called ‘legal cannabis’. These products claim to use non–intoxicating CBD oils, with only small traces of THC (the part of the plant that gets you high), to help ease various physical and mental ailments.

It’s still illegal for any kind of medicinal claims to be made for CBD in Britain, but its devotees say it can play a big role in reducing pain, lowering blood pressure and relieving symptoms of depression and insomnia. Typically, it is distilled into tonic drinks, supplement pills or edible oils which can be marketed to fashionable millennials and the health-conscious middle-aged.

In the US, where the industry has evolved alongside recreational marijuana, sales of these products are expected to be worth some $2 billion within four years. It’s even possible to buy CBD supplements for elderly and arthritic dogs.

As by-products of the cannabis plant, though, such supplements are still illegal to manufacture in Britain: it’s only EU laws which mean that imported CBD products can be sold here without any kind of licence. It’s not the only instance of people taking advantage of confusion in EU laws about cannabis. In July last year, it was discovered that online retailers based in Switzerland had produced a low-strength cannabis which they were claiming could be sold legally under European law. It’s not true (their weed is just a bit weaker than normal black market stuff), but their produce can still be bought online and shipped to the UK.

Added together, medical marijuana and CBD represent a rapidly changing industry, already worth some hundreds of millions of pounds each year. More importantly, they show a growing acceptance of cannabis among Britain’s political and business establishments — and this is making investors very excited. After all, since Britain has emerged as a world leader (an accidental one at that) in this field, could manufacturing medical marijuana be our next boom industry — both at home and abroad?

A useful first step would be a change in the law about the use of such medicines here, which would allow a lucrative home market for UK-patented drugs such as Epidiolex to open up. Allowing biotech start-ups to develop the next generation of marijuana meds would break the effective monopoly enjoyed by GW Pharmaceuticals.

And what about the ultimate hippy pipe-dream: the legalisation of recreational cannabis in Britain? Thanks no doubt to developments in the US and Canada, the issue has enjoyed some momentum in recent years. Politicians ranging from Nigel Farage to Sir John Major have suggested it’s time to revisit Britain’s harsh drug laws, with many stressing the tax benefits and the opportunity to take soft drugs out of the sphere of violent gangs. The Canadian system, which allows state-regulated recreational weed for over-18s, is seen as a potential model for this.

Walking back across town, it seems I’ve arrived on the wrong day to catch a whiff of the famous Downham Market fog. Never mind that, though: there’s no denying that what’s happening here could have huge repercussions for Britain’s future.

Stories Continues after ad

Capt. Francis Babu to Mutabazi: I will not allow UCC to run my company

DISATISFIED WITH UCC: Capt. Francis Babu.

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Metro FM, Capt. Francis Babu is caught up in a feud with the Executive Director of Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), Godfrey Mutabazi after Babu told him to mark where he stops in communication industry.

Mutabazi was backed up by CEO Next Media, Kin Kariisa, they exchanged bitter words with Capt. Babu after he vowing not to allow UCC run his company other than regulating it. This unfolded during the meeting of National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and UCC over the suspension of 39 journalists from 13 media houses.

Despite having Joyce Bagala, the head of News at NBS TV and other journalists suspended by the regulator from their current positions, Kariisa continued supporting Mutabazi a move that shocked many owners of media houses.

They resolved that journalist should step aside for one month for UCC to carry our investigations.

The 39 journalists are accused of airing live videos and sound bites as police arrested Kyadondo East MP, Robert Kyagulanyi aka Bobi Wine on April 29, at Kalerwe market as he proceeded to Kibuli Police Criminal Investigation Department (CID) where he was summoned over allegations of breaching of police guidelines and traffic rules.

Below is how it started.

Babu told Mutabazi that he could have talked to the CEOs of various media house other than suspending journalists. “You could have handled it in a better way, it has gone out internationally, we are ashamed, and yesterday I heard citizens talking about us in Kenya, I was disgusted. I heard journalist in parliament insulting you and I was annoyed. I heard people saying all sorts of things, it is because of the way you have handled media issues. You would have handled it better, you would have listened,”

Babu accused Mutabazi of running to newspapers and threaten to terminate licenses of various media houses after publishing content against government. “You like going to papers and intimidate us something I don’t like, you would have talked to us, we are as good as you are.” He told him during the meeting.

Adding “We like this industry, it employs a lot of people, it is an economic venture in this county, I want you to imagine something, Aljazeera, CNN, BBC put everything on air which are insulting and our media here is locked up in jail. What are you regulating?” he asked

He said the incident reminds him of the war where they stopped listening to Radio Uganda and listened to BBC because they would tell them what was going on. Are you going to neglect them with the kind of content they publish?

Mutabazi however, felt uneasy after he threatened to discipline Capt. Babu for going against him, “Capt. kindly stick to the issue,” said Mutabazi.

Capt. Babu instead said, “No am sticking to the issue, this is where the problem is, you don’t want us to talk to you, we come here and you gamble us, let’s talk you , listen, don’t guard us, you want to be listen to and you don’t want to listen to us.

“Disciplining me, why would you discipline me, because I have spoken the truth? Disciplining me at this age, No.. No.., Time has come for us to tell you the truth, we want to work with you, but you must work with us and we must respect you don’t disrespect us.” He said.

However, Kin Kariisa started backing Mutabazi despite having Joyce Bagala, the head of News at his NBS TV and other journalists suspended by the regulator.

Kariisa interjected, Hon. Babu, Mr. Mutabazi is the chairman, let’s listen to each other, “he called us for the meeting and at the end of the day media houses have to go out with resolutions and work. Babu however, said Mutabazi too must listen to him though is the regulator.”

Babu, said “He (Mutabazi) is the regulator and I respect him, and I said so, I am not going to have UCC run our company.

Kariisa interjected gain saying that UCC must run them (media houses). Babu told him they (UCC) must regulate no running media houses.

“If Mr. Kariisa you have joined him, it is ok but am going to speak what hurts me, if you don’t want me to speak it is ok but the problem will not be solved.” Capt. Babu concluded.

Stories Continues after ad

Bright Stars, Express fight for a place in the Uganda Cup final

Express FC host Bright Stars on Thursday 9th May in the second leg of the 2019 Stanbic Uganda Cup semifinals at Wankulukuku.

The first leg at Mwererwe ended in a one-all draw with Michael Birungi scoring for the Red Eagles before Bright Stars equalized through Nelson Senkatuka from the penalty spot.

Bright Stars will need to score to have any chance of qualifying for the final because a 0-0 draw will favour the Red Eagles due to the away goals’ rule.

Bright Stars will definitely put their hopes in their skipper Nelson Senkatuka to lead them from the front. He scored 5 goals in their 6-1 win against Paidha Black Angels on the last day of the league, finishing the league with 16 goals.

The Red Eagles have won the Uganda Cup a record 10 times shared with KCCA, the last time they were in the semifinals in 2017 they were eliminated by KCCA 3-2 on aggregate.

Bright Stars are in the semifinals for the first time in their history.

Team News from Express FC website; Eric Kambale was injured in the game against KCCA FC at Lugogo but he is expected to be back.

Mathias Muwanga, the goalkeeper didn’t travel with the team to Arua on Saturday. He was injured in light training with the squad which remained in Kampala and he will be monitored to see his readiness on Thursday.

Hamis Batega, the defender traveled with the team to Arua and played the entire match. However, he is suffering from a hamstring injury and may miss out on Thursday.

Arthur Kiggundu, the defender was on the receiving end of a tackle against Bright Stars at Mwererwe in the first leg. He was given 10 days to be out which ended on Sunday. He is expected to be back in training on Monday 6th.

Big League side Proline FC await for the winner between the two Uganda Premier League sides in the final on Saturday May 25th.

The final will be played on at the Masaka Recreational Stadium.

The winner of the competition represents Uganda in the Caf Confederation Cup as per the rules of the competition. KCCA FC are the defending champions.

The winning club of the Uganda Cup will walk away with Shs40 million, runners up Shs20 million, semi-finalists Shs10 million while the quarter finalists walked away with Shs5 million.

Stories Continues after ad