Stanbic Bank
Stanbic Bank
23.9 C
Kampala
Stanbic Bank
Stanbic Bank
Home Blog Page 2

Mayiga’s “Traitors” remark on Uganda Martyrs sparks storm on Namugongo Celebrations

Buganda Kingdom Premier, Charles Peter Mayiga.

KAMPALA — Buganda Katikkiro Charles Peter Mayiga has stirred sharp public debate after suggesting that the Uganda Martyrs could have been viewed as “traitors” by the Buganda Kingdom leadership during the reign of Kabaka Mwanga II.
The remarks, made in an interview published by the Daily Monitor ahead of Uganda Martyrs Day, have drawn mixed reactions from religious believers, historians and cultural commentators at a time when thousands of pilgrims are gathering at Namugongo for annual commemorations.
Mayiga reportedly argued that history should be understood within its political context, saying that while Christians honour the martyrs as heroes of faith today, the kingdom administration at the time may have regarded them as subjects who defied royal authority.
According to the Katikkiro, the young converts openly resisted some instructions from the Kabaka and increasingly aligned themselves with foreign religious teachings introduced by European missionaries — actions that could have been interpreted as betrayal within the kingdom’s political structure.
His comments immediately triggered heated discussions online, with some Ugandans accusing him of diminishing the sacrifice of the martyrs, while others defended the statement as a historically grounded observation rather than an attack on Christianity.
The Uganda Martyrs remain among the most respected religious figures in Africa’s Christian history. The 45 martyrs — including both Catholic and Anglican converts — were executed between 1885 and 1887 after refusing to abandon their Christian faith.
Many historians believe the killings occurred during a period of intense political tension in Buganda, where traditional authority structures were increasingly being challenged by the arrival of foreign religions and external influence.
At the center of the conflict was Kabaka Mwanga II, who feared the growing power of Christian converts within his royal court and viewed foreign missionaries as a threat to the sovereignty of his kingdom.
The executions later transformed the young converts into symbols of religious courage and resistance. In 1964, Pope Paul VI canonized the Catholic martyrs during a historic visit to Uganda, elevating their significance in global Christianity.
Today, Uganda Martyrs Day is one of the country’s largest annual religious events, attracting millions of pilgrims from across Africa and beyond to Namugongo Martyrs Shrine.
Despite criticism directed at Mayiga, some historians argue that the Katikkiro’s remarks reflect a broader academic debate that has existed for decades — whether the martyrs should be viewed solely through a religious lens or also within the political struggles of pre-colonial Buganda.
Political analyst and historian discussions on social media intensified following publication of the interview, with many emphasizing that historical figures are often interpreted differently depending on perspective.
Others, however, insisted that using the word “traitors” in reference to the martyrs was inappropriate, particularly during a sacred period of remembrance for Christians.
By Tuesday evening, major church leaders had not issued official statements responding directly to the controversy.
The debate now adds a new layer of tension and reflection to this year’s Martyrs Day celebrations, an occasion traditionally marked by prayer, pilgrimage and messages of unity.
As Uganda commemorates the martyrs’ sacrifice, Mayiga’s remarks have reignited difficult questions about loyalty, faith, colonial influence and how history should be remembered in modern Uganda.

Stories Continues after ad

Businessman Shumuk Mukesh sent to Luzira Prison over land fraud

Businessman Shukla Babubhai Mukesh alias Shumuk Mukesh.

City businessman Shukla Babubhai Mukesh alias Shumuk Mukesh has been remanded to Luzira Prison over land fraud dispute involving a prime property along Jinja Road, Eagle Online reliably reports. 

This case adds to a growing list of legal battles that have trailed him in recent years.

Mukesh was arrested after months of allegedly failing to appear before court despite repeated summons. He is expected to return before the Nakawa Chief Magistrate’s Court on June 15.

The dispute stems from a contested land transaction reportedly valued at several billion shillings. Court proceedings indicate that Mukesh is accused of acquiring an interest in the property after allegedly paying about Shs250 million, a fraction of its estimated value.

The matter became more complicated following the death of the property’s original owner, whose beneficiaries are now seeking either the recovery of the land or compensation arising from the disputed transaction. The case has also attracted the interest of another party said to be a genuine purchaser of the property.

Sources familiar with the proceedings say court had for months struggled to secure Mukesh’s appearance, with explanations ranging from illness to travel abroad. However, after his continued absence, judicial officers reportedly ordered his arrest, culminating in his detention and remand to Luzira Prison.

The latest case places Mukesh back in the spotlight over a series of property-related disputes and court battles that have followed him over the years.

In May 2024, Mukesh was remanded to Luzira Prison on charges of obtaining more than Shs220 million by false pretence from Alvi Auto Village Ltd in a disputed land transaction. Prosecutors alleged that he received $27,950 and more than Shs116 million after representing that his company could lease out two parcels of land located in Nakawa and Banda Industrial Area.

According to the prosecution, the complainant paid the money believing the land was available for lease and possession, only for the transaction to become the subject of a legal dispute. Mukesh denied the allegations, but the case became one of the most publicised property disputes involving the businessman.

The dispute later moved to the Commercial Division of the High Court, where Shumuk Investments Ltd was ordered to compensate Alvi Auto Village Ltd after the court found the company liable for breach of contract, misrepresentation and deceit. The court held that the company had failed to honour obligations under the tenancy agreements and had made representations regarding the properties that were ultimately not fulfilled.

Mukesh’s legal troubles did not end there.

In October 2022, the businessman was convicted on several counts of uttering false documents in a high-profile property dispute involving the family of the late businessman Bonney Katatumba. The court found that documents used in support of ownership claims over the disputed property were not genuine.

The Katatumba property dispute would later return to court, culminating in a ruling in 2025 in which the High Court ordered Mukesh and several of his companies to pay approximately Shs14 billion to the Katatumba family for unlawfully occupying and benefiting from parts of the disputed property. The court found that the family had suffered substantial losses as a result of the prolonged occupation.

The latest arrest is expected to intensify public scrutiny of Mukesh, whose business empire has frequently found itself at the centre of some of Uganda’s most contentious property disputes.

The case will resume before the Nakawa Chief Magistrate’s Court on June 15, where prosecutors are expected to present further details as investigations continue. 

Stories Continues after ad

Makerere student petitions Education Ministry over UNSA NEC re-election eligibility

The Makerere University student has petitioned the Ministry of Education and Sports seeking an official interpretation of the Uganda National Students Association (UNSA) Constitution on whether serving National Executive Committee (NEC) members are eligible to seek re-election to the offices they currently occupy.

The petition, submitted on June 2, 2026, by Keta Patience, a registered student of Makerere University and member of UNSA, was received by the Ministry’s Security Registry and copied to the Executive Secretary of UNSA and the Speaker of UNSA.

In the petition addressed to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Education and Sports, Keta argues that conflicting interpretations of the UNSA Constitution and election guidelines have created uncertainty among students regarding the legality of incumbent NEC members seeking another term in office.

“I bring this petition to your office to provide an official interpretation and guidance regarding the eligibility of serving National Executive Committee (NEC) members to seek re-election into offices they currently occupy,” Keta wrote.

The petitioner noted that the matter is of public interest and is intended to support the institution in achieving its objectives as stipulated under Article 3(1.4) of the UNSA Constitution.

According to the petition, the amended UNSA Constitution of 2022 provides under Article 7 on Elections and Article 7(2) on the Term of Office that members of the Executive Committee hold office from the date of swearing-in until the next Annual General Meeting held before the end of December each year.

However, Keta argues that while the Constitution specifies the duration of office, it does not expressly state whether incumbents may seek re-election after the expiry of their terms.

“The Constitution does not expressly state whether an incumbent NEC member may or may not seek re-election to the same office after the expiration of his or her term,” the petition states.

“Article 7(2) only stipulates the duration of office and circumstances under which a vacancy may arise, without expressly creating a term limit or prohibition against re-election.”

The petition further raises concerns about provisions contained in previous UNSA electoral guidelines.

Keta cites Regulation 6 of the election guidelines used during the 36th National Students’ Council elections, which provides that no student leader who previously served as a UNSA NEC member or represented UNSA in other bodies shall be registered as a delegate, except for secondary school students.

According to the petitioner, the provision appears to restrict former or current NEC members from seeking nomination for other NEC positions, creating an apparent inconsistency with the Constitution.

“It is not clear whether this restriction originates from the Constitution, the supreme law of all students’ organizations, or a resolution of the National Students’ Council as a legislative organ of UNSA,” Keta wrote.

The petitioner argues that the contradiction between the Constitution and electoral guidelines has left several critical questions unanswered, including whether incumbent NEC members can lawfully seek re-election to the same office, whether former NEC members can contest for different NEC positions, whether electoral guidelines can impose restrictions not expressly provided for in the Constitution, and which legal instrument prevails in the event of a conflict.

Keta further cites Article 2 of the UNSA Constitution, which establishes the Constitution as the supreme law governing the association.

“Any rule, regulation or guideline inconsistent with the Constitution may be subject to challenge,” the petition states.

The student argues that the Ministry of Education and Sports is well placed to provide guidance because it is represented on the UNSA Board of Trustees through the Permanent Secretary and exercises oversight responsibilities over student governance matters.

“Given that the Ministry of Education and Sports is represented on the UNSA Board of Trustees through the Permanent Secretary and considering the Ministry’s oversight role in student governance matters, we respectfully seek your guidance on proper interpretation of these provisions,” Keta wrote.

The petitioner is seeking a formal clarification on whether serving NEC members are eligible for re-election, whether election guidelines can lawfully bar NEC members from seeking another term where the Constitution does not expressly provide such a restriction, and a directive requiring all UNSA electoral processes to be conducted in strict conformity with the Constitution.

Keta also asked the ministry to issue any additional guidance necessary to safeguard transparency, fairness and constitutionalism in future UNSA elections.

“We believe that a timely clarification will promote confidence in the electoral process and prevent avoidable disputes among students and stakeholders,” Keta stated.

Keta added, “We remain committed to the principles of democratic governance, constitutionalism and accountability within UNSA.”

Stories Continues after ad

Save me from PSST Ggoobi, Insurance boss Kaddunabbi cries to Gen. Saleh as he is pushed out of office

Mr Ibrahim Kaddunabbi.

The Chief Executive Officer of the Insurance Regulatory Authority of Uganda (IRA), Alhaj Dr. Kaddunabbi Ibrahim Lubega has appealed to Senior Presidential Advisor Gen. Caleb Akandwanaho alias Saleh to intervene in the campaign by the Permanent Secretary and Secretary to the Treasury (PS/ST), Ramathan Ggoobi, to frustrate the renewal of his employment contract.

In a letter dated May 29, 2026, Kaddunabbi sought Gen. Saleh’s urgent intervention, just two days before the expiry of his current contract as head of the country’s insurance regulator.

The letter lays bare a deepening dispute between the veteran insurance executive and the Ministry of Finance leadership, with Kaddunabbi claiming that his future at the authority had been thrown into uncertainty.

“I am now certain that PS/ST Mr. Ggoobi intends to hit me and destroy me beyond. The circumstances at hand can only be managed by you, not by anyone else,” Kaddunabbi wrote to Gen. Saleh.

The IRA boss reminded the influential presidential advisor that the pair had previously met on April 22, 2026, where they discussed the matter and reviewed documents that he later submitted regarding his concerns.

Kaddunabbi said he was increasingly worried about the handling of his contract renewal and appealed to Gen. Saleh to use his influence to ensure what he termed as a fair and impartial process.

“I respectfully appeal to you to intervene and ensure that justice prevails and that my contract renewal is processed without prejudice. Your leadership and authority carry the weight to safeguard fairness and protect those who serve honorably,” he stated.

The letter also reveals Kaddunabbi’s belief that the disagreement with Ggoobi can still be resolved through dialogue.

In an unusually personal appeal, he asked Gen. Saleh to convene and chair a mediation meeting between him and the Treasury chief to restore harmony and pave the way for him to serve another term at the authority.

“Aware that we are brothers with no reason why we fight each other, I kindly request you, Sir, to cause a mediatory meeting between PS/ST Mr. Ggoobi and myself, chaired by yourself, with a view to harmonise us to allow me serve my last term as Chief Executive Officer at the Insurance Regulatory Authority 2026–2031 as he continues his role too,” Kaddunabbi wrote.

The outgoing CEO also highlighted his loyalty to the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) government and his contribution to public service, arguing that he had served both the country and the party with dedication and sacrifice.

“I remain committed to serving my NRM Government and the people of Uganda diligently, especially those in the Insurance Sector, as a cadre. Previously, I have participated in nation-building and in my party, the NRM. All this required personal sacrifice and dedication, which I rendered unreservedly,” he said.

Kaddunabbi has been at the helm of the Insurance Regulatory Authority for several years, overseeing reforms aimed at strengthening regulation, increasing insurance penetration, and promoting confidence in Uganda’s insurance industry.

His appeal to Gen. Saleh comes at a critical moment as uncertainty continues to surround his future at the authority and whether he will secure another five-year term.

The revelations are likely to trigger fresh debate about governance and leadership succession at the Insurance Regulatory Authority, one of the country’s key financial sector regulators.

Stories Continues after ad

Dr. Muganga rejected by Appointments Committee for State Minister post over dual citizenship

The Parliamentary Appointments Committee has rejected the appointment of Prof. Lawrence Muganga as State Minister for Internal Affairs, with concerns over his dual citizenship emerging as the decisive factor during his vetting.

The committee revealed that Muganga, who holds both Ugandan and Canadian citizenship, pledged to renounce his Canadian citizenship if approved for the ministerial position. 

However, a majority of committee members remained unconvinced that the commitment was sufficient to satisfy constitutional and legal requirements governing eligibility for certain public offices.

The development makes Muganga the only nominee among a group of dual citizens vetted by the committee to be rejected.

During the closed-door vetting sessions, Uganda’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Adonia Ayebare, and businessman and entrepreneur Calvin Echodu also faced questions regarding their dual citizenship status.

Ayebare, who was recently appointed Minister of State for Foreign Affairs (International Affairs), acknowledged holding both Ugandan and American citizenship and reportedly assured the committee that he would renounce his foreign citizenship in compliance with the law.

Similarly, Echodu, who was nominated for the position of State Minister for ICT and National Guidance, informed legislators that he would relinquish his American citizenship should his appointment be confirmed.

Several members of the committee expressed reservations about the assurances given by the nominees, the committee leadership and presiding officers strongly defended their nominations, arguing that the appointees had demonstrated willingness to comply with the legal requirements.

Following deliberations, Ayebare and Echodu secured majority support and were approved for appointment, while Muganga failed to garner enough votes to win the committee’s endorsement.

The rejection is likely to hype the debate over the eligibility of dual citizens to occupy certain public offices in Uganda, a matter that has generated legal and political controversy for years.

Muganga, an educationist and university administrator, was nominated to serve as State Minister for Internal Affairs as part of President Yoweri Museveni’s latest Cabinet reshuffle. He currently serves as the Vice Chancellor of Victoria University and is widely known for his advocacy of education reforms and digital transformation in higher learning institutions.

The decision by the Appointments Committee now leaves uncertainty over who will ultimately fill the State Minister for Internal Affairs position, as Parliament prepares to conclude scrutiny of the President’s latest ministerial appointments.

The approvals of Ayebare and Echodu, meanwhile, clear the way for their formal swearing-in and assumption of duties, pending the completion of the remaining constitutional processes.

The question is now on constitutional provisions governing dual citizenship and public office whether nominees should first renounce their foreign citizenship before appointment or whether a commitment to do so is sufficient during the vetting process.

Stories Continues after ad

Constitutional Court orders for prosecution of ex-Trade Ministry PS Geraldine Ssali 

IN THE DOCK, Geraldine Ssali, the former Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Trade.

The Constitutional Court has ordered the prosecution of former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives, Geraldine Ssali Busuulwa, after striking down provisions of the Human Rights (Enforcement) Act that allowed accused persons to be acquitted without a full trial.

In its decision, the court declared Section 11(2)(a), (b) and (c) of the Human Rights (Enforcement) Act unconstitutional to the extent that it permits courts to nullify criminal proceedings and acquit accused persons solely because their non-derogable rights were violated during investigations or prosecution, without first hearing and determining the substantive charges against them.

The ruling will have far-reaching implications for several ongoing criminal cases, including the high-profile corruption case involving Ssali, whose lawyers had sought to rely on the contested legal provisions to challenge the proceedings against her.

The Constitutional Court held that while the protection of fundamental rights remains a cornerstone of Uganda’s justice system, violations of those rights cannot automatically result in an acquittal before the charges are heard and determined.

“The provision admits no judicial discretion and thereby supplants the constitutional requirement that acquittal follow a full adjudication of charges,” the justices ruled.

The court emphasized that criminal proceedings must strike a balance between safeguarding the rights of accused persons and ensuring accountability through lawful judicial processes.

In the judgment, the court further held that the right to a fair hearing under Article 28(1) of the Constitution is not reserved exclusively for accused persons but also extends to victims of crime and society at large.

“The right to a fair hearing applies to ‘a person’ and therefore extends to victims of crime,” the court stated, adding that victims have both substantive and procedural interests in criminal proceedings, including the right to seek compensation and access justice.

The judges found that the impugned provisions denied victims an opportunity to be heard by prematurely terminating criminal cases and granting acquittals without determining whether the accused committed the offences in question.

According to the court, such an approach undermines Article 20 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality and access to rights, and Article 44(c), which makes the right to a fair hearing non-derogable.

“The constitutional balance requires protection of non-derogable rights while preserving the accused’s accountability to lawful processes and victims’ access to justice,” the court observed.

The petitioners had argued that Section 11(2) effectively allowed courts to acquit suspects without trial, thereby frustrating victims’ rights and undermining the constitutional presumption of innocence, which requires evidence to be tested in a court of law before guilt or innocence is determined.

On the other hand, defenders of the law had maintained that the provision was intended to provide effective remedies where serious violations of constitutional rights had occurred during criminal proceedings.

However, the Constitutional Court distinguished previous decisions where prosecutions had been halted because of extreme and exceptional violations of fair trial rights, noting that those cases were fact-specific and could not justify a blanket statutory rule requiring acquittal.

“The right to a fair hearing under Article 44(c) is non-derogable, but remedies for violations of that right must not extinguish the rights of victims or negate the constitutional requirement for a fair trial on the original charges,” the judgment noted.

As part of its orders, the court declared the disputed provisions unconstitutional, affirmed that victims’ rights to a fair hearing must be protected in all criminal proceedings, and directed that courts and tribunals ensure victims are afforded the procedural safeguards necessary to vindicate those rights.

Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

The ruling will influence the handling of future criminal cases by limiting the circumstances under which courts can terminate prosecutions before trial and reinforcing the principle that allegations of criminal wrongdoing must ordinarily be determined through a full hearing on their merits.

Stories Continues after ad

Gen. David Muhoozi recalled to UPDF for redeployment 

BACK TO UNIFORM: Gen. David Rabakuba Muhoozi.

Former State Minister for Internal Affairs, Gen. David Muhoozi, has been recalled to active military service by the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) leadership, paving the way for his redeployment within the armed forces following his omission from the recently announced Cabinet reshuffle.

The development comes just days after President Yoweri Museveni dropped Gen. Muhoozi from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, where he had served as State Minister since June 2021 after leaving his position as Chief of Defence Forces (CDF). Reports indicate that the four-star General has now been directed to report back to the military establishment as the UPDF prepares to assign him a new role.

However, neither the Ministry of Defence nor the UPDF has officially disclosed the position to which the veteran officer will be deployed.

Gen. Muhoozi remains one of Uganda’s most experienced military commanders, having served in the army for more than four decades. He rose through the ranks after joining the National Resistance Army in the mid-1980s and went on to occupy several strategic command positions, including Commander of the Armoured Brigade, Commander of the Motorised Infantry Brigade, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and Commander of Air Defence.

In 2017, President Museveni appointed him Chief of Defence Forces, a position he held until June 2021 when he handed over command to Gen. Wilson Mbadi and transitioned into Cabinet as State Minister for Internal Affairs. During his tenure as CDF, the UPDF expanded its regional security engagements, strengthened professional military training and modernisation programmes, and maintained Uganda’s participation in peace and security operations across the region.

At the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Gen. Muhoozi played a key role in overseeing sectors under the ministry’s mandate, including immigration, citizenship, national identification, prisons, and internal security coordination. 

His military background was widely seen as an asset in strengthening coordination between civilian and security institutions.

His departure from Cabinet last week sparked widespread speculation regarding his future, with political and security observers questioning whether he would retire from public service or return to the military where he built much of his career.

The recall now appears to have answered part of that question, although uncertainty remains over the exact assignment awaiting the former army commander.

Military analysts say Gen. Muhoozi’s vast experience in command, strategic planning and national security makes him one of the few senior officers capable of taking on high-level assignments within the defence and security establishment.

For now, attention remains focused on the next move for the former Chief of Defence Forces, whose return to the UPDF signals that his public service career is far from over.

Stories Continues after ad

Allegations against OPM official Alex Rwabs baseless-IGG source

Alex Rwabs Mujuni.

The Inspector of Government ( IGG) has cleared Alex Rwabs Mujuni, a Personal Assistant in the Office of the Prime Minister, over allegations of wrongdoing.

Credible but anonymous sources from the IGG indicated that Mujuni has an impeccable record in the Public Service, with a proven record of integrity dating from his stints at the Ministry of Gender and Ministry of Information and Communication Technology.

A source at the IGG clarified that allegations against Mujuni were investigated, and no incriminating evidence against him was found.

Earlier on, there were allegations levelled against Mr Rwabs, but now, with clearance from the Ombudsman, it is evident that they were mere rumours.

Stories Continues after ad

Kagadi questions, “What more must we do?” after fresh cabinet exclusion

Voters in Kagadi waiting to cast their votes.

KAGADI — A wave of political reflection has emerged in Kagadi District following the latest Cabinet appointments, with residents and local leaders questioning why the area continues to miss out on executive representation despite long-standing support for President Yoweri Museveni and the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM).
The renewed debate comes after yet another reshuffle that left Kagadi without a Cabinet minister, prompting concerns that the district’s political loyalty has not translated into what some describe as “national recognition.”
“We support the government consistently, but when Cabinet positions are announced, Kagadi is nowhere. People are beginning to ask what more is required,” one local leader said.
The sentiment is increasingly echoed across community meetings and political discussions within the district, where residents argue that representation in Cabinet could improve the district’s ability to lobby for infrastructure development and social services.
Kagadi, created in 2016 after being carved out of Kibaale District, remains a stronghold for the NRM in western Uganda. However, residents say the district continues to face development challenges, including poor road networks, limited healthcare services, and high youth unemployment.
Some leaders believe that having a Cabinet representative would strengthen the district’s voice in national planning and help attract more government attention to local priorities.
However, political analysts caution that Cabinet appointments are determined by a combination of factors, including regional balance, political strategy, competence, and institutional considerations, rather than electoral support alone.
Government supporters also argue that development is guided through national budgeting systems, meaning districts receive services regardless of Cabinet presence.
Still, frustration in Kagadi is growing, with calls emerging for the district leadership to formally engage senior NRM structures and seek clearer explanations ahead of future reshuffles.
As discussions continue, the issue remains a sensitive political talking point in Kagadi, reflecting broader national debates on inclusion, representation, and the distribution of executive power.

Stories Continues after ad

Ugandan content creator Master Parrot dies on Northern Bypass road crash

RIP: Master Parrot.

KAMPALA, Uganda — Ugandan content creator and entertainer Master Parrot has died following a tragic road accident along the Northern Bypass in Kampala on Tuesday evening, sending shockwaves across the country’s online entertainment community.
According to preliminary reports, the accident occurred along the busy bypass route during the evening hours. Sources close to the incident indicated that Master Parrot sustained severe injuries in the crash and was pronounced dead shortly afterward. Authorities had not yet released a comprehensive statement about the exact circumstances surrounding the accident by press time.
The sudden death of the popular entertainer sparked an outpouring of grief online, with fans, fellow creatives, musicians, and social media personalities expressing disbelief and mourning the loss of one of Uganda’s recognizable digital entertainers.
Master Parrot built a name for himself through comedic skits, online commentary, and engaging social media content that resonated with young Ugandans. Over the years, he gained a loyal audience across platforms, becoming part of Uganda’s fast-growing digital entertainment space.
Friends and followers described him as energetic, creative, and deeply passionate about entertainment. Many recalled his consistency in producing relatable content that often blended humor with everyday social experiences.
The tragedy has once again renewed public concern over road safety along Kampala’s major highways and bypasses, particularly during evening traffic hours when accidents are common. The Northern Bypass has in recent years recorded several fatal crashes involving motorists, pedestrians, and commercial riders.
By Tuesday night, tributes continued pouring in across social media platforms as Ugandans remembered Master Parrot’s contribution to local entertainment and youth culture.
Several entertainment figures called for greater support and protection for young creatives whose work continues to shape Uganda’s online media landscape.
Police were expected to issue an official communication after investigations into the crash scene and circumstances surrounding the accident.
Funeral arrangements had not yet been officially announced by family members at the time of publication.
More details will be provided as they unfold.

Stories Continues after ad